MICROCUFF* Subglottic Suctioning Endotracheal Tube
RINSE. SUCTION. CLEAR.
Combining more effective subglottic suctioning with our advanced HALYARD* polyurethane cuff technology, you can finally provide the BEST protection against microaspirtion. MICROCUFF* Subglottic Suctioning Endotracheal Tubes are proven to be more effective at preventing and clearing clogs. Now you no longer have to struggle to make subglottic suctioning actually work!5,7,8
Finally, a Clear Change to Subglottic Suctioning
Using a subglottic suctioning endotracheal tube can cause clogged lumens. This makes it difficult and sometimes impossible to clear out using air bolus.
THE NEED FOR CHANGE WAS CLEAR. THE STRUGGLE WITH CLOGS IS OVER.
3 Simple Steps: Rinse. Suction. Clear.
MICROCUFF* Subglottic Suctioning ETT enables the safe use of saline rinsing to effectively clear clogs.7,9
- Suction lumens clog up to 44% of the time -preventing effective suctioning of secretions.9
- Saline rinsing is more effective than air bolus at loosening and clearing clogged suction lumens.9
- The suction valve with integrated rinse port enables both suctioning and saline rinsing, without opening the suction circuit, preventing cross-contamination to both caregiver and patient.7
Suctions Secretions More Effectively and Efficiently…with a Push of a Button
- When clogged lumens prevent effective suctioning, subglottic secretions are known to accumulate up to 13mL per hour, increasing the risk of microaspiration.2
- With reports of suctioning dysfunction as high as 48% due to clogs,1,2 suctioning is inconsistent.
A Clear Change for Clearly Superior Results
- A polyurethane cuff reduces channel formation, minimizing cuff leakage and enabling the use of saline6.
- Polyurethane cuffs prevent fluid leakage, demonstrating 93% less mircroaspiration than TaperGuardtm Evac ETT.7
- Because saline rinsing is more effective than air bolus at clearing clogs, subglottic secretions are suctioned more effectively9.
1. Dragoumanis, et. al Investigating the Failure to Aspirate subglottic secretions with
EVAC Endotracheal Tube Oct 2007.
2. DePew, et. al Subglottic Secretion Drainage: A Literature Review AACN V18N4 2007.
3. ATS Guidelines for the management of adults with HA, VA, and HCA Pneumonia Dec 2004.
4. Ricard, et. Al Influence of tracheal suctioning systems on health care workers’ gloves and equipment
contamination: A comparison of closed and open systems, 2011 Association for Professionals in Infection
Control and Epidemiology.
5. Freytag C.C., Thies F.L., Konig W., Welte, T. Infection, Clinical and Epidemiological Society. 31-2003-No.1.
6. Lorente, et. al, Influence of an Endotracheal Tube with polyurethane cuff and subglottic secretion drainage
on Pneumonia, May 2007.
7. Data on file 510K Clearance K120985.
8. Data on file. Directions for Use for the Halyard MICROCUFF Subglottic Suctioning Endotracheal Tube.
9. Data on file #R151219. Evaluation of Fluid Leakage Past Tracheal Tube Cuffs: Effects of Tracheal Size
and Cuff Pressure.
10. TaperGuard™ EVAC EET Directions for Use (2011).
11. S. Mehta and HM Myat. The cross-sectional shape and circumference of the human trachea. Annals of
the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 1984; 66: 356-358 & NT Griscom, B Wohl.